![]() Epichrome.app creates Chrome-based site-specific browsers (SSBs) for Mac OSX (Chrome must be installed in order to run them, but they are full Mac apps, each with its own separate Chrome profile).Įach app automatically installs Epichrome Helper, which uses rules to decide which links the app should handle itself, and which should be sent to the default web browser. Here's the two first paragraphs from the readme:Įpichrome is made up of two parts: an AppleScript-based Mac application (Epichrome.app) and a companion Chrome extension (Epichrome Helper). This in turn enable you to use the same Chrome plugins that you use and love in your Chrome browser, inside your generated site-specific-browser-app. If you are running OSX, there's a nifty little project on Github called Epichrome which allow you to create webapps framed in a native browser-window, much in the same way as Fluid.app is doing – the difference being that for Epichrome-based apps, the underlying engine is Chrome/Blink, and not Safari/Webkit. There are no features like that in Harvest.This question is old as **** by know, but in case anyone stumbles upon it I thought I'd chip in with a little tip: Timeoff page shows all vacations, sick leaves, and any other PTO types. Timecard page displays when a user started their workday, when they had breaks and when they finished their work. Timesheet page helps to view the structured picture of the time a member spent for a week. Timers page shows what your team is doing right now. Conditional formatting allows you to highlight various pieces of data in individual cells of your reports. Multiple layout types give you the possibility to see data from the best angle. Easy play with columns and filters, add or exclude specific info, change orders, apply different formatting and filters. There are no fixed reports in Everhour, which allows you to construct your version for your particular goals. While exporting data to third party apps and generating statistics by hand is time-consuming. They are not able to provide real management insights. Reports in Harvest are easy to scan, but they are not very detailed and flexible when it comes to configuration. The details could reveal a very different picture. If you go deeper in Everhour, the details info can show you that development cost you 15h, 9h were spent on QA, 6 on design and 10 for BA. That is very useful when several team members are working on one task.Īs seen on the video, there were 40 hours logged on a task. The progress results of each colleague could be found in the task details. But surprisingly, neither Harvest nor basic options of Asana, Trello, Basecamp, Notion or GitHub don’t provide these opportunities. You can pick up this info only in Harvest reports.Įverhour, in its turn, is built to complement the Asana’s functionality with valuable and helpful data and empower your existing processes.Įstimation is an important element of any project management approach. Not really useful, isn’t it? Also, the reported data can not be visible in the Asana interface. And, for example, if you rename a task in Asana, you should also manually rename it in Harvest. Harvest doesn’t sync any additional but crucial data of your project like sections or tags, while Everhour does. While your Asana task is just a free-text comment and the amount of time reported into the task to date is only displayed at the bottom of the popup. This popup lets you select a project and a type of activity (which you had to create in advance in the Harvest settings) to associate the reported time with it. ![]() In most cases, Harvest just adds an icon, which will show you a pop-up window after clicking. And finally, why Everhour is a perfect Harvest alternative and why you should consider switching.Įverhour is the first-rate integration for teams who use Asana, ClickUp, Notion, Basecamp, Trello, GitHub, Monday or Jira. ![]() The information below will help you to understand the essential principles of Everhour and Harvest, including our vision, ideas for future and reviews of our customers who have already gone for Everhour. Furthermore, those products were not flexible enough, and the makers didn’t plan any additional development for them. We will also describe how they will influence and, ideally, complement the processes at your company.īefore we jumped from one time tracking tool to another every few months, and invested so much time on its adaptation and integration, just to understand in the end that our data can’t be analyzed the way we want. But we decided to go deeper and make a comparison of products’ principles and concepts. The most of the articles provide a differentiation just on the features of the tools. If you are considering between Everhour and Harvest, our comparison below will help you to choose the best time tracking solution for your team.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |